Nonprofit Bridge

While not specific to ephilanthropy, Stacy Jones recent article in Philanthropy Journal, Mistakes Nonprofits Can’t Afford to Make, highlights many important marketing basics that nonprofits often neglect:

• focusing only on the mission and not using story-telling to connect emotionally with constituents
• targeting messaging on how constituents can help rather than on the organization
• not using a clear call to action to show ways donors or volunteers can help
• using consistent messaging across all communications
• not providing enough funding to support marketing efforts

For more ideas on this topic, take a look at Network for Good’s many nonprofit marketing resources as well as Katya Andresen’s non-profit marketing blog and book Robin Hood Marketing,  Small changes in how we interact with our constituents can make a huge difference in how connected they are with our organizations.

Guidestar summarizes recent Giving USA online fundraising survey:

• while Internet giving is widely used, it still represents a small portion (under 5%) of overall fundraising
• most common way organizations raise money over the web is through an online donation page
• best results come from organizations that combine an online donation page with email appeals

Overall, social networking tools aren’t contributing much – yet, but an organization that utilizes online ‘communities’ is likely to improve results.

Care2’s FrogLoop blog interviews Phillip Artez, President of Artez on how to choose an eCRM.  Phillip says that successful nonprofit fundraisers “aren’t afraid to share brand, content and promotion with their supporters” and reminds us that a large portion of funds will come from a small group of fundraisers so we should “treat them differently.”  He mentions three areas where nonprofits should especially pay attention to: potential of social networking sites such as Facebook, donations originating from mobile devices and more organizations utilizing SalesForce (which has excellent connectivity to other systems and provides up to 10 free licenses to nonprofits).

Finally, the Nonprofit Times explains the importance of using multiple channels since many donors will visit the web before making a donation - even if it’s offline and, surprisingly, even more so for constituents 65 and older.  PerDonordigital’s Nick Allen, “more people are online, more people are doing research online, checking out charities they support or are thinking about supporting.” But NPAdvisor’s expert Rick Christ warns that “nonprofit’s Web site should try to support direct mail, but not replace it.” and that direct mail is still how many first hear about a nonprofit. Convio’s Vinay Bhagat adds that while blogs and social networking are getting more attention, the core web site is still the main way constituents will evaluate a nonprofit.

Many contributors to the Nonprofit Times article, including Nten’s Holly Ross stressed the importance of integrating the web site with email appeals.

Michael Hoffman, CEO of See3 asked this question on the Nten elist this week: how [do] other organizations create a balance between the Communications and the Fundraising departments when it comes to online initiatives. How should Communications and Fundraising interact without having turf battles?

A fascinating discussion has resulted, which is nicely summarized by Nten.

What ideas do you have for improving collaboration between departments that have traditionally operated separately?

Congratulations to the winners at the recent New York Times Company Nonprofit Excellence Awards: Community Health Action of Staten Island (overall management excellence), Harlem RBI (communications), Itefayo Cultural Arts (culturally based management strategies) and the Institute for Public Health (use of technology / focus on mission). Below on the overall areas of nonprofit excellence on which these organizations were judged:

1. overall management focus on results
2. governance structure that moves the organization forward
3. strong, transparent and accountable financial management
4. inclusive and diverse organizational practices
5. enlightened use of human and other resources
6. regular and effective communications
7. effective, ethical fundraising and development

Note to the Nonprofit Coordinating Committee of New York and New York Regional Association of Grantmakerswho collaborated with the NY Times to recognize these exemplary nonprofits – for next year, how about an additional award to congratulate the nonprofit that has best been able to integrate offline and online strategies so that the true promise of ‘multi-channel’ communications and fundraising is realized?  This would be a gentle reminder to those nonprofits who haven’t yet realized that constituents prefer to interact with our organizations in many different ways, only some of which are online.

Ted Hart provides a look at how online fundraising has grown from $0 in 1999 to $10.44 billion in 2007.  A graph and brief write-up is available at Slideshare.

The Chronicle of Philanthropy recently pointed out that while online giving still represents a small part of most nonprofits’ fundraising, for some charities they have become a major source of revenue,  These five organizations have done especially well, raising at least 10% of their donations online: Heifer International (28%), Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (27%), Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund (21%), National Multiple Sclerosis Society (15%) and Make-A-Wish Foundation (10%).

Are you waiting for ephilanthropy tools to work perfectly before taking the plunge?  If so, read Vin Crosbie’s take on Ted’s People to People Fundraising site on why tools are ‘good enough‘ to use now.