Enabling Donors to Choose How Money Is Used

This week I was invited to take a look at GiveLoop, a new software platform for processing online donations.  Inspired by sites such as Kiva and DonorsChoose, GiveLoop allows nonprofits to empower constituents to decide exactly how their donations will be used by ‘voting with their money.’  Benefits for the nonprofit are to increase donation size, increase donor loyalty and increase donor volume, as well as providing more transparency.  If you’ve looked at direct mail appeals you’ve received lately, you will probably notice how donation levels are often associated with what each amount will allow the nonprofit to do, but doesn’t obligate the organization to use the funds for that purpose.

While GiveLoop offers an interesting new way to do online fundraising, most organizations I’ve worked with have been wary of collecting restricted funds, partially due to the accounting requirements and partially because they really don’t want to give constituents this level of control.  But this reminds me of the difficulty some nonprofits have had in embracing social media because they want to control the messaging.  But as Clay Shirky pointed out at last year’s Nonprofit Technology Conference, ‘you’ve already lost control.’

However, I like the idea of GiveLoop as continuing the recent trend of giving donors more information about what their money will be used for, and then reporting back on how the donations were actually used.  GiveLoop also tries into social networking, although co-founder Todd Spitz told me that it was too early to tell whether constituents who have given through GiveLoop have been successful in becoming fundraisers for the causes they support.

For a nonprofit that is considering using a product like GiveLoop, a question to ask is whether the organization is really interested in listening to their supporters, or if they are doing it simply to raise more money.  If it’s the latter, then the effort is less likely to be successful as constituents will eventually realize that their input is not welcome.  There also needs to be full transparency about what will happen if the requested funds for a specific project are not raised;  will the balance be made up by another donation source or will the donor be asked to consider supporting another initiative?

Interestingly, GiveLoop’s FAQ clearly states that the nonprofit is not obligated to use the money in the way donors select.  But to make the most of this type of program, an organization clearly has to be willing to give constituents a much greater role in how funds are spent, similar to why it’s so important to listen first in social media and not simply treat it as another way to send out nonprofit updates.

New Competition for ‘Traditional’ Nonprofits

While reviewing an online donation form recently, I came across this default question: “keep me informed about how my gift is being used.”  This seemed like an opportunity to find out exactly how a donation would be used by our organization. e.g. to support research, to sponsor an event, to provide constituent service.  However it turned out that this question was actually intended as an opt-in for email communication.  Needless to say, I advised that we revise the language so the constituent isn’t promised something that we aren’t prepared to deliver.

Yet in a recent Chronicle of Philanthropy article, Give and Take (subscription required), many new nonprofits were profiled that can tell donors exactly how their funds are used by allowing constituents to contribute directly to a project of their choice.  This trend is referred to as ‘direct giving’ or ‘peer-to-peer philanthropy’ and is utilized by organizations such as GlobalGiving, Kiva, DonorsChoose and ModestNeeds.

These nonprofits are maintained through mostly optional fees added to the donation, although GiveMeaning is trying the advertising route. Since none of these organizations are self-supporting yet, it’s unsure whether this concept will survive and, if so, which of these charities will remain.  However, the ability to donate directly to a cause is an area where many traditional nonprofits cannot compete, especially when donations for specific causes are discouraged so funds received are not ‘restricted’ in their use.

Without the Internet, this type of philanthropy would not exist.  Make a donation to one of these organizations and see how your constituent experience compares to what you’ve received from most traditional nonprofits.  For a profile of these types of sites, visit Peter Dietz’s Social Actions

Innovative ways to use technology in nonprofits