Taking a Look at Website Usability

In his latest book Rocket Surgery Made Easy, Steve Krug debunks the misconception that it takes a lot of money and resources to test your website for usability.  You can actually accomplish a lot in one morning a month by offering three users a relatively small amount to do basic tasks while you watch and listen.  So if this is so simple, why do so many sites suffer from what seem to be obvious usability problems?

  1. Testing is done, but with staff from your organization (to save money).  For the best results, you need to recruit users who are not already familiar with your company, product or services and who don’t have any vested interests in how to respond
  2. Testing occurs too late in website development process, when it is too late to address the issues that come up
  3. Management isn’t involved in the usability testing process, and as a result they don’t understand why its findings are so valuable
  4. Organization decides not to make changes until the next major site redesign;  as Steve mentions, often a minor tweak is enough to solve a problem
  5. There is confusion about what your major site objectives are;  this often causes your home page to have too much information and satisfies your internal departments but not your intended user audience
  6. Trying to do too much;  it’s best to focus on those issues which are causing confusion for the most users and are the most serious (not simply an inconvenience)
  7. Site design requires too many steps to complete most common objectives or provides too many distractions which take user off task

Many of us have looked at our website so often that we know how everything works, and where in the menu we need to go to find certain tasks.  But we are not our audience. Take the time to do some website usability testing, and you will be surprised how frustrated your users get trying to do simple things, like complete a financial transaction.  To learn more, read Steve Krug’s earlier book Don’t Make Me Think, and subscribe to updates from Jakob Nielsen’s UseIt.com site.

Jakob Nielsen on Non-Profit Web Site Usability

No one knows more about usability than Jakob Nielsen;  he recently tested nonprofit web sites and found that much can be done to optimize online giving.  Major points:

  1. nonprofit web sites are good at attracting new donations but less so in ‘sustaining long term donor relationships’
  2. potential donors primarily want information on the organization’s mission, objectives and work as well as how it uses donations but few nonprofits provide this information prominently on their home page, where many constituents begin (and may end) their research
  3. donations are discouraged by usability problems relating to page /site design and by poor content not optimized for the web

Not to my surprise, Jakob also mentioned how poorly large affiliate based organizations integrate national web sites with local chapter sites, saying that most looked ‘completely different’ from the main web pages.  At my organization, we provide templates to insure some level of consistency, but there still isn’t enough coordination to insure consistency with our national site.

This report shows the value of doing actual user testing, not just asking others in your nonprofit what they think users want.  Don’t wait until you’re ready to do a full web site redesign, which for many of us may not happen very often.  Use inexpensive tools such as 4Q and SurveyMonkey to learn how your web site can be improved.

Jakob’s full report is available here.

Staying Positive Despite Bad News All Around Us

A recent Chronicle of Philanthropy article mentions that not only have many nonprofit organizations (including my own) already had to cut staff, but that worse times are ahead.   A Foundation Center forecast describes how foundations are dealing with the economic crisis.  According to this New York Times article, rising unemployment is threatening worldwide stability.  Is there any good news left?

In a recent enewsletter, usability guru Jakob Nielsen recommends email newsletters and search engine marketing as the two most cost effective Internet marketing techniques.  Network for Good’s Katye Andresen offers 5 Keys to Pulling out of the Economic Nosedive.   Commenting on Donor Digital‘s recent findings, Sue Woodward recommends that despite a slight drop in average gifts, the number of donations has so far remained steady and that nonprofits should continue to use the tools, strategies and techniques that have made your your fundraising plans successful in the past.

Fund-It offers a way to raise funds every time constituents search, adding functionality over past tools of this type such as GoodSearch and Freelanthropy.

John Kenyon offers tips for creating your 2009 online fundraising plan.  Network for Good advises on a simple way to make donating easier for donors.  Heather Mansfield offers Five Things Your Nonprofit Needs to Know About Web 2.0 Donors.

With our resources so constrained, is social media still worth the investment?  Social Velocity thinks so but this Non-Profit Tech Blog post seems to indicate that other priorities must come first.

Finally, Internet Strategy Forum founder Steve Gehlen offers the State of the Internet Executive, a synposis of a recently completed study on how differently online strategies are managed in a wide range of for-profit and not-for-profit organizations.  The updated study is now available.

Meanwhile, at my organization, while I feel fortunate to still have my job, I’m busier than ever trying to keep up.  What ways have you found to stay upbeat while so many nonprofits are struggling?